2013 (10) TMI 660

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Department in the premises of the Company on 21.2.2006, no returns came to be filed by the Company in question. Certain incriminating documents were seized indicating various transactions relating to the business of construction carried on by the appellant. In spite of issuance of notices in accordance with the procedure, the appellant kept quiet without filing returns, therefore, proceedings came to be initiated and proposal for completion of assessment under Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (best judgment) proposing income as the 20% of the gross receipts came to be issued. However, according to the appellant, audited accounts, including balance sheet were produced, though returns were not filed. The Company came up with its ob....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....me estimated for the assessment year 2002-03? If the assessee has not followed the project completion method or substantial completion method, how the finding of the CIT (Appeals) is justified? And above all, where is the material to show that the project was not completed even upto 5%? As already stated, in the absence of relevant details, the Assessing Officer was constrained to make an assessment on the basis of the materials available before her. The only material available before the Assessing Officer was the details of gross collections, that too not fully safe-vouched. It was in such circumstances that the Assessing Officer has estimated the income at 20% of gross collections." 3. The main contention of the appellant is, estimatio....