1984 (3) TMI 371

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ly, 1971, has referred the following question for the opinion of this Court: "Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned Member has rightly ordered for continuation of stay of recovery proceedings till disposal of the appeal by the party notwithstanding the rejection of the revision itself on the grounds of non-maintainability?"   The aforesaid reference has been m....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ince the respondent had filed the revision petition under a bona fide belief that an appeal did not lie against the order, it appeared to be in the interest of justice that he should be given time to file an appeal and the time which was spent by him in prosecuting the revision petition should be excluded in computing the period of limitation for the appeal and further that the order which had bee....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... petition filed by the respondent against the order dated 22nd August, 1968, was not maintainable and that the respondent should have filed an appeal against the said order. Having found that the revision petition filed by the respondent was not maintainable, the learned Member of the Board of Revenue was, in our opinion, not competent to give any direction in the revision petition with regard to ....