<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 371 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154788</link>
    <description>A revision petition found to be not maintainable could not support continuation of an interim stay of recovery proceedings after dismissal. The High Court held that the statutory power to stay recovery under section 14(5) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 operated only during the pendency of a maintainable revision and ceased once the revision was dismissed as not maintainable. The direction extending the stay until disposal of a possible appeal was therefore invalid, as the authority lacked jurisdiction to keep the stay alive beyond the life of the revision petition. The reference was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:36:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 371 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154788</link>
      <description>A revision petition found to be not maintainable could not support continuation of an interim stay of recovery proceedings after dismissal. The High Court held that the statutory power to stay recovery under section 14(5) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 operated only during the pendency of a maintainable revision and ceased once the revision was dismissed as not maintainable. The direction extending the stay until disposal of a possible appeal was therefore invalid, as the authority lacked jurisdiction to keep the stay alive beyond the life of the revision petition. The reference was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>