Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after holding a revision petition to be not maintainable, the authority could direct continuation of the interim stay of recovery proceedings till disposal of a possible appeal.
Analysis: The revision petition was found to be not maintainable, and the respondent ought to have pursued an appeal against the original order. Once the revision was being dismissed, the authority had no jurisdiction to extend the interim stay beyond the life of the revision petition. The statutory power to stay recovery under section 14(5) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 was confined to the pendency of the revision petition and could not support continuation of the stay after dismissal for non-maintainability.
Conclusion: The direction continuing the stay of recovery proceedings till disposal of the appeal was not valid and the question was answered in the negative, in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the assessee, and the order extending the stay after dismissal of the revision could not be sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: The power to grant or continue an interim stay under the relevant revision provision exists only during the pendency of a maintainable revision and ceases when the revision is dismissed as not maintainable.