Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (5) TMI 502

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....N. Chattopadhyay, Consultant, for the Appellant. Shri J.K. Jha, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)]. -  Heard both sides at length. 2. The appellants declared the parameters of their rolling mill under Notification No. 32/97-C.E. (N.T.), dated 1-8-97, initially on 26-8-97 and stated that the diameter was 170 mm. The said declaration was v....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....given by the adjudicating Commissioner is that the verification could not be done between the date of second declaration and the verification on 28-12-98 for various reasons such as the rolling mill having been dismantled etc. However, we find no allegation in the records that the appellants altered the parameters during the period between the declaration on 19-9-97 and the date of verification on....