Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (5) TMI 501

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., Sr. Advocate and Partha Banerjee, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri Y.S. Loni, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)].  Heard both sides. 2. Shri S.K. Bagaria. ld. Advocate appearing for the Appellants states that the impugned order has been passed adding Rs. 44/- per Kilolitre to the assessable value in respect of the entire clearance dur....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Rs. 44/- as allowed by the Oil Coordination Committee though they have incurred a cost of 65 Rupees, evidence regarding which has been given to the Adjudicating Commissioner. Shri Bagaria states that according to Valuation Rules in force during the impugned period the actual cost of transportation/equalized freight is allowed to be deducted from the assessable value. The deduction claimed by the ....