<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 501 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122362</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, KOLKATA ruled in favor of the Appellants in a case concerning the valuation of petroleum products for excise duty. The Tribunal found that the Appellants had adequately demonstrated that transport charges should be excluded from the assessable value, as per relevant Valuation Rules. The Tribunal noted the lack of clear findings by the Adjudicating Commissioner and doubts regarding the charges, ultimately concluding that there was no valid reason to add Rs. 44/- to the assessable value. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, with the Stay Application also being disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:09:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 501 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122362</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, KOLKATA ruled in favor of the Appellants in a case concerning the valuation of petroleum products for excise duty. The Tribunal found that the Appellants had adequately demonstrated that transport charges should be excluded from the assessable value, as per relevant Valuation Rules. The Tribunal noted the lack of clear findings by the Adjudicating Commissioner and doubts regarding the charges, ultimately concluding that there was no valid reason to add Rs. 44/- to the assessable value. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, with the Stay Application also being disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>