Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revised declaration of the rolling mill parameters was required to be given effect from 1-9-97, the date on which the notification was amended and the alternative scheme of taxation based on ACP came into force.
Analysis: The appellants had made the revised declaration on 19-9-97, and the Department later verified it and found it substantially correct. The record disclosed no allegation that the appellants altered the relevant parameters between the date of declaration and the date of verification. In these circumstances, once the notification was amended with effect from 1-9-97 by introducing a different basis for determining the crucial parameters, the revised declaration could reasonably be applied from that date.
Conclusion: The revised declaration was to operate from 1-9-97, and the appellants were entitled to the benefit of the revised ACP from that date.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a revised declaration corresponds to the amended statutory basis and there is no allegation of alteration of material parameters in the intervening period, the declaration may be given effect from the date the amended notification becomes operative.