2002 (5) TMI 731

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i C. Mani, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member, (J)]. -  In this application for condonation of delay, the delay sought to be condoned is 178 days beyond the normal period requires to be filed the appeal. The impugned order was served on the appellants on 30th June, 2001. Three months time ended on 30th September, 2001. This appeal has been filed on 27th March, 200....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....le the appeal to challenge the legality of levy of CVD on the item Damar-Batu. Only after another Commissioner took a different view in the case of Srinivasa Trading Company the appellants thought they can file an appeal against their order. This is a clear case of negligence. The appellants should have taken steps to file their appeal in time. They have accepted the Commissioner's order. Only whe....