https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106355 A 178-day delay in filing the appeal was refused condonation because the appellants gave no genuine or sufficient explanation and had already accepted the original order without timely challenge. A later favourable decision in another matter was held not to be a valid ground for condonation, and cited authorities were distinguished as involving genuine reasons or only minimal delay. The delay application was rejected, and the appeal consequently did not survive. en-us Mon, 27 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:45:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106355 A 178-day delay in filing the appeal was refused condonation because the appellants gave no genuine or sufficient explanation and had already accepted the original order without timely challenge. A later favourable decision in another matter was held not to be a valid ground for condonation, and cited authorities were distinguished as involving genuine reasons or only minimal delay. The delay application was rejected, and the appeal consequently did not survive. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 27 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106355