Appeal Dismissed: Delay Condonation Rejected for Filing Beyond Time Limit. The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Chennai rejected the appeal for condonation of delay, which was 178 days beyond the normal filing period. The appellants' ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal Dismissed: Delay Condonation Rejected for Filing Beyond Time Limit.
The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Chennai rejected the appeal for condonation of delay, which was 178 days beyond the normal filing period. The appellants' negligence in filing the appeal promptly and only doing so after another party obtained a favorable order led to the rejection of the condonation application and the subsequent dismissal of the appeal.
The appeal for condonation of delay was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Chennai. The delay sought to be condoned was 178 days beyond the normal period for filing the appeal. The appellants were negligent in filing the appeal in time and only decided to file it after another party received a favorable order. The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and consequently rejected the appeal.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.