2001 (6) TMI 639

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Appellant. Shri A.K. Jain, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  These three appeals are filed against the common order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals). Therefore, these are being taken up together. 2. Brief facts of the case are that M/s. Bharat Steel Rolling Mills, the appellants, are engaged in the manufacture of M.S. Girders. On 24-4-94, a truck bearing No. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....0,000.00 was imposed on M/s. Vijay Enterprises. A demand of Rs. 75,131.00 was confirmed on M/s. Bharat Steel Rolling Mills on the goods found short. A penalty of Rs. 15,000.00 was imposed on the appellants, M/s. Bharat Steel Rolling Mills and a penalty of Rs. 5,000.00 was imposed on M/s. Shabana Transport Co. and also ordered confiscation of the truck and ordered the release of the truck on paymen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of the shortage was done on estimate basis, which was not denied by the Revenue authorities. He, therefore, submits that the Revenue authorities also recorded the statements of S/Shri P.K. Goel and Nand Kumar. These persons were also not produced for cross-examination. Therefore, their statements cannot be relied upon against the appellants. He, therefore, submits that the appeals be allowed. ....