<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 639 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100590</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal overturned penalties and confiscation imposed on appellants engaged in manufacturing M.S. Girders due to a shortage of final products. Discrepancies in witness statements, lack of cross-examination, and estimation method for detecting shortages rendered the orders unsustainable. The tribunal set aside previous decisions, emphasizing procedural irregularities and insufficient evidence, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:57:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 639 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100590</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal overturned penalties and confiscation imposed on appellants engaged in manufacturing M.S. Girders due to a shortage of final products. Discrepancies in witness statements, lack of cross-examination, and estimation method for detecting shortages rendered the orders unsustainable. The tribunal set aside previous decisions, emphasizing procedural irregularities and insufficient evidence, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>