Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (6) TMI 640

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cture and removal of the final product, the appellants have filed the present appeal. 2. The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of wood and articles of wood classifiable under Chapter 44 of the Central Excise Tariff. Based upon an intelligence report, the Preventive Officers of Central Excise Headquarters, Patna visited the appellants' factory on 23-5-98 and conducted various checks and verifications. It was found that the RG-I register was not written upto-date. Certain private records maintained by the appellants allegedly reflecting the actual production and clearance of their final product on day-to-day basis, were also resumed by the Officers. Physical stock-taking of the finished goods was undertaken and it was found th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... with the entries made in RG-I register, duly corroborated by the statements of the various persons. The authorities below have specifically referred to Private Book No. 11 resumed from the appellants' factory. It has been observed in the order of the original adjudicating authority that there is an entry under heading - "Total Stock upto 18-4-98 (4 p.m.)". But when this figure was cross-tallied with RG-I register, it was found that the quantity of finished product entered in RG-I on 18-4-98 was much less than that of the quantity shown in the said Book No. 11 for the same date. To corroborate the above finding, reference has been made to the statement of Shri Rudal Singh, Supervisor given on the spot, which is to the effect that Book No. 1....