<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 640 -  CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100591</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the duty demand confirmation and reduced the personal penalty from Rs. 1,63,556.54 to Rs. 75,000.00 for the appellants engaged in wood product manufacturing. The tribunal found discrepancies between private records and official registers, supporting the allegation of clandestine removal of goods without duty payment. Despite the appellants&#039; argument regarding inaccuracies in private records, the tribunal emphasized the lack of effort to disprove the entries. The appeal was mostly rejected, with a modification in the penalty amount, and the stay petition was disposed of in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:02:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 640 -  CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100591</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the duty demand confirmation and reduced the personal penalty from Rs. 1,63,556.54 to Rs. 75,000.00 for the appellants engaged in wood product manufacturing. The tribunal found discrepancies between private records and official registers, supporting the allegation of clandestine removal of goods without duty payment. Despite the appellants&#039; argument regarding inaccuracies in private records, the tribunal emphasized the lack of effort to disprove the entries. The appeal was mostly rejected, with a modification in the penalty amount, and the stay petition was disposed of in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>