<h1>Government jobs-for-every-family pledge questioned for fiscal feasibility and implications for voter rolls and immigration policy.</h1> The article critiques a pledge to provide government jobs to every family by challenging the fiscal feasibility of funding salaries for millions of additional public servants, characterising the promise as electorally driven and financially unsustainable; it also advocates scrutiny and removal of alleged irregular voters and frames development achievements and future industrial and employment priorities as outcomes of current governance.