<h1>Article 226 challenge to UAPA Section 4 order finding adjudicatory body not equivalent to civil forum; certiorari available</h1> The high court held it has jurisdiction under Article 226 to entertain a writ challenging an Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Tribunal order that upheld the Centre's five-year ban on an organisation, finding the tribunal's role under Section 4 is not equivalent to a civil court's and therefore its orders are susceptible to certiorari. The court found the petition maintainable, issued notice to the central government to reply within six weeks, granted two weeks to the petitioner to file a rejoinder, and listed the matter for further hearing on January 20, 2026.