<h1>Judicial interventions protect individuals in high-profile cases while orders on information disclosure and trial cognisance face legal scrutiny.</h1> Supreme Court interventions emphasise procedural safeguards: protection from arrest for a psephologist in electoral misinformation FIRs; refusal to restrain unverified public statements about a foreign death row case; and restraint on a trial court from taking cognisance of a chargesheet against a university professor for social media posts. High court orders include setting aside an information commission's disclosure direction about a political leader's degree and refusing to stay trial proceedings in a criminal drugs distribution matter, while lower courts managed custody extensions and hearing dates in several high profile cases.