<h1>Territorial integrity threatened as presidential rhetoric proposes seizing foreign territory, risking diplomatic fallout and emboldening rivals.</h1> Rhetoric advocating seizure or control of strategic territories-Panama Canal, Greenland-and pressure on Canada frames use of military force and economic coercion as instruments of national security and economic policy. Such proposals challenge the principle of Territorial Integrity, risk eroding norms against altering borders by force, and may embolden rival states while straining alliances. Affected states have rejected sovereignty negotiations, and experts warn of destabilising diplomatic and security consequences if rhetorical threats translated into policy.