Anti-profiteering obligations survive business demerger, complaint withdrawal, and customized supply arrangements where rate-reduction benefits are no...
Road restoration charges constitute taxable services when requested for commercial pipeline activity, requiring reverse-charge GST from the business r...
Interest on delayed release of requisitioned cash includes statutory pre-assessment interest and restitutionary compensation for unlawful post-assessm...
Incomplete inventory records justify rejecting accounts, while profit estimation requires relevant comparable material and interest falls under other ...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires functional alignment; delayed associated-enterprise receivables need separate LIBOR-based benchmarking, while ...
Page of 4915
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
121 to 140 of 98300 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Bad-debt deduction was available where full invoice amounts had been recognised as income, retained sums remained receivables, and those receivables were written off as irrecoverable; the related disallowance was deleted without requiring proof that the debts became bad in a particular year. Related-party rent could not be disallowed without comparable or other material establishing excessiveness or unreasonableness against fair market value; suspicion or an allegation of non-revenue neutrality was insufficient, and the disallowance was deleted. A challenge confined to initiation of penalty proceedings was premature and was dismissed.
Bad-debt deduction was available where full invoice amounts had been recognised as income, retained sums remained receivables, and those receivables were written off as irrecoverable; the related disallowance was deleted without requiring proof that the debts became bad in a particular year. Related-party rent could not be disallowed without comparable or other material establishing excessiveness or unreasonableness against fair market value; suspicion or an allegation of non-revenue neutrality was insufficient, and the disallowance was deleted. A challenge confined to initiation of penalty proceedings was premature and was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.