<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bad-debt write-offs and related-party rent: deductions sustained where receivables were written off and no market-value excess was shown.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105152</link>
    <description>Bad-debt deduction was available where full invoice amounts had been recognised as income, retained sums remained receivables, and those receivables were written off as irrecoverable; the related disallowance was deleted without requiring proof that the debts became bad in a particular year. Related-party rent could not be disallowed without comparable or other material establishing excessiveness or unreasonableness against fair market value; suspicion or an allegation of non-revenue neutrality was insufficient, and the disallowance was deleted. A challenge confined to initiation of penalty proceedings was premature and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 07:01:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 07:01:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Bad-debt write-offs and related-party rent: deductions sustained where receivables were written off and no market-value excess was shown.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105152</link>
      <description>Bad-debt deduction was available where full invoice amounts had been recognised as income, retained sums remained receivables, and those receivables were written off as irrecoverable; the related disallowance was deleted without requiring proof that the debts became bad in a particular year. Related-party rent could not be disallowed without comparable or other material establishing excessiveness or unreasonableness against fair market value; suspicion or an allegation of non-revenue neutrality was insufficient, and the disallowance was deleted. A challenge confined to initiation of penalty proceedings was premature and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 07:01:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>