Separate speaking orders on reopening objections are mandatory; deciding them within reassessment invalidates jurisdiction and precludes revival of st...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
641 to 660 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rule 26(2) personal penalty for invoices issued without delivery of goods requires proof that the individual issued, or abetted the issue of, such invoices. Penalty against a director was unsustainable where the company received no show-cause notice, the director was not an authorised signatory, and no finding established issuance, connivance, or abetment. Purchasers' reversal of credit did not independently establish liability. Truck-owner statements could not be relied upon without compliance with the mandatory procedure for admitting statements under section 9D. The penalty was set aside with consequential relief.
Rule 26(2) personal penalty for invoices issued without delivery of goods requires proof that the individual issued, or abetted the issue of, such invoices. Penalty against a director was unsustainable where the company received no show-cause notice, the director was not an authorised signatory, and no finding established issuance, connivance, or abetment. Purchasers' reversal of credit did not independently establish liability. Truck-owner statements could not be relied upon without compliance with the mandatory procedure for admitting statements under section 9D. The penalty was set aside with consequential relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
