<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Personal penalty for invoices without goods requires proven issuance or abetment and procedurally admissible witness statements.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105102</link>
    <description>Rule 26(2) personal penalty for invoices issued without delivery of goods requires proof that the individual issued, or abetted the issue of, such invoices. Penalty against a director was unsustainable where the company received no show-cause notice, the director was not an authorised signatory, and no finding established issuance, connivance, or abetment. Purchasers&#039; reversal of credit did not independently establish liability. Truck-owner statements could not be relied upon without compliance with the mandatory procedure for admitting statements under section 9D. The penalty was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 05:20:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 05:20:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Personal penalty for invoices without goods requires proven issuance or abetment and procedurally admissible witness statements.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105102</link>
      <description>Rule 26(2) personal penalty for invoices issued without delivery of goods requires proof that the individual issued, or abetted the issue of, such invoices. Penalty against a director was unsustainable where the company received no show-cause notice, the director was not an authorised signatory, and no finding established issuance, connivance, or abetment. Purchasers&#039; reversal of credit did not independently establish liability. Truck-owner statements could not be relied upon without compliance with the mandatory procedure for admitting statements under section 9D. The penalty was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 05:20:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>