Head Office cost allocation requires prescribed transfer-pricing methods; treaty ceilings bar surcharge and cess, while duplicate taxation is excluded...
Cost-to-cost reimbursement of seconded employees is not service consideration; transfer-pricing markup was deleted and amalgamation amortisation allow...
Crystallisation of liability supports prior-period expense deduction, while functionally distinct divisions require separate transfer-pricing benchmar...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires transaction-specific FAR analysis before benchmarking business-support services provided to associated en...
Section 292BA cures defects only in an assessment or assessment...
Document Identification Number compliance renders TDS-default orders invalid where mandatory DIN requirements are breached and curative provision does not apply.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Section 292BA cures defects only in an assessment or assessment order and does not extend to a TDS-default order under section 201(1)/(1A). Although such an order may be treated as assessment-like in another statutory context, its legislative character as an order cannot be converted into an assessment order for this curative provision. Mandatory Document Identification Number requirements under the CBDT Circular therefore governed validity. Issuance without a DIN was a substantive legal breach rather than a technical defect, rendering the TDS-default order invalid and requiring its quashing along with the appellate order.
Section 292BA cures defects only in an assessment or assessment order and does not extend to a TDS-default order under section 201(1)/(1A). Although such an order may be treated as assessment-like in another statutory context, its legislative character as an order cannot be converted into an assessment order for this curative provision. Mandatory Document Identification Number requirements under the CBDT Circular therefore governed validity. Issuance without a DIN was a substantive legal breach rather than a technical defect, rendering the TDS-default order invalid and requiring its quashing along with the appellate order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.