<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Document Identification Number compliance renders TDS-default orders invalid where mandatory DIN requirements are breached and curative provision does not apply.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105079</link>
    <description>Section 292BA cures defects only in an assessment or assessment order and does not extend to a TDS-default order under section 201(1)/(1A). Although such an order may be treated as assessment-like in another statutory context, its legislative character as an order cannot be converted into an assessment order for this curative provision. Mandatory Document Identification Number requirements under the CBDT Circular therefore governed validity. Issuance without a DIN was a substantive legal breach rather than a technical defect, rendering the TDS-default order invalid and requiring its quashing along with the appellate order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:20:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:20:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Document Identification Number compliance renders TDS-default orders invalid where mandatory DIN requirements are breached and curative provision does not apply.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105079</link>
      <description>Section 292BA cures defects only in an assessment or assessment order and does not extend to a TDS-default order under section 201(1)/(1A). Although such an order may be treated as assessment-like in another statutory context, its legislative character as an order cannot be converted into an assessment order for this curative provision. Mandatory Document Identification Number requirements under the CBDT Circular therefore governed validity. Issuance without a DIN was a substantive legal breach rather than a technical defect, rendering the TDS-default order invalid and requiring its quashing along with the appellate order.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:20:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>