Delayed judgment pronouncement alone does not invalidate Tribunal orders, while rectification cannot reopen evidence or negate confiscation-related pe...
Agricultural-land reinvestment qualifies when transfer consideration precedes replacement purchase, while unexamined claims may be reassessed on escap...
Bona fide public fixed-deposit explanations prevent concealment penalties where unexplained-credit additions lack independent evidence of undisclosed ...
Factory-consumption condition restricts solar module parts exemption and excludes imported aluminium profiles fabricated outside the production factor...
Page of 4910
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 98196 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Compulsory share buy-out orders in oppression and mismanagement proceedings require a prior finding that the alleged conduct falls within the statutory framework and satisfaction of the requisite conditions before remedial powers may be exercised. The share-purchase power is consequential rather than independent. A compulsory buy-out must also rest on the shares' current value at the determination date, or on a valuation closely proximate to that date. Failure to object to a valuation does not remove the Tribunal's duty to assess its genuineness and suitability. A valuation based on an earlier financial position was insufficient; the buy-out direction was quashed and fresh valuation and merits determination were required.
Compulsory share buy-out orders in oppression and mismanagement proceedings require a prior finding that the alleged conduct falls within the statutory framework and satisfaction of the requisite conditions before remedial powers may be exercised. The share-purchase power is consequential rather than independent. A compulsory buy-out must also rest on the shares' current value at the determination date, or on a valuation closely proximate to that date. Failure to object to a valuation does not remove the Tribunal's duty to assess its genuineness and suitability. A valuation based on an earlier financial position was insufficient; the buy-out direction was quashed and fresh valuation and merits determination were required.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4910 
