<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Compulsory share buy-outs require prior oppression findings and current valuation, requiring reconsideration when statutory conditions are unmet.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105038</link>
    <description>Compulsory share buy-out orders in oppression and mismanagement proceedings require a prior finding that the alleged conduct falls within the statutory framework and satisfaction of the requisite conditions before remedial powers may be exercised. The share-purchase power is consequential rather than independent. A compulsory buy-out must also rest on the shares&#039; current value at the determination date, or on a valuation closely proximate to that date. Failure to object to a valuation does not remove the Tribunal&#039;s duty to assess its genuineness and suitability. A valuation based on an earlier financial position was insufficient; the buy-out direction was quashed and fresh valuation and merits determination were required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:20:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:20:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Compulsory share buy-outs require prior oppression findings and current valuation, requiring reconsideration when statutory conditions are unmet.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105038</link>
      <description>Compulsory share buy-out orders in oppression and mismanagement proceedings require a prior finding that the alleged conduct falls within the statutory framework and satisfaction of the requisite conditions before remedial powers may be exercised. The share-purchase power is consequential rather than independent. A compulsory buy-out must also rest on the shares&#039; current value at the determination date, or on a valuation closely proximate to that date. Failure to object to a valuation does not remove the Tribunal&#039;s duty to assess its genuineness and suitability. A valuation based on an earlier financial position was insufficient; the buy-out direction was quashed and fresh valuation and merits determination were required.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:20:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>