Advance pricing agreement methodology can guide benchmarking for non-covered years when functions, assets, risks and activities remain materially unch...
Tax-audit exemption for substantially State-funded educational universities prevents audit-failure penalties where income qualifies for statutory exem...
Functional, asset and risk analysis excludes diversified technology companies from captive software development comparables under cost-plus arrangemen...
Mobile-phone electronic evidence failed to establish customs undervaluation, while duty survived on non-authentic origin certificates without importer...
Automotive radio classification treats integrated infotainment features as supplementary, placing complete and qualifying unassembled units under the ...
Separate corporate personality prevents directors from being personally liable for company deposits without a guarantee or independent legal undertaki...
Rule 10B(3) requires examination of differences that materially affect net profit margins and reasonably accurate comparability adjustments where quantification is possible. Capacity underutilisation and differing customs-duty burdens may distort manufacturing-segment profitability, but claims require complete quantitative and documentary support and fresh functional comparability analysis. Regulatory ceilings for external commercial borrowings do not replace transfer-pricing arm's-length benchmarking; interest comparables must reflect materially similar credit profile, scale and risk attributes rather than rely on a single unsuitable comparable. Penalty proceedings for under-reporting, misreporting or alleged false entries remain separate from assessment proceedings, making a challenge to their initiation premature.
Rule 10B(3) requires examination of differences that materially affect net profit margins and reasonably accurate comparability adjustments where quantification is possible. Capacity underutilisation and differing customs-duty burdens may distort manufacturing-segment profitability, but claims require complete quantitative and documentary support and fresh functional comparability analysis. Regulatory ceilings for external commercial borrowings do not replace transfer-pricing arm's-length benchmarking; interest comparables must reflect materially similar credit profile, scale and risk attributes rather than rely on a single unsuitable comparable. Penalty proceedings for under-reporting, misreporting or alleged false entries remain separate from assessment proceedings, making a challenge to their initiation premature.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.