<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Transfer-pricing comparability adjustments require quantified evidence, while regulatory borrowing ceilings do not replace arm&#039;s-length benchmarking.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104903</link>
    <description>Rule 10B(3) requires examination of differences that materially affect net profit margins and reasonably accurate comparability adjustments where quantification is possible. Capacity underutilisation and differing customs-duty burdens may distort manufacturing-segment profitability, but claims require complete quantitative and documentary support and fresh functional comparability analysis. Regulatory ceilings for external commercial borrowings do not replace transfer-pricing arm&#039;s-length benchmarking; interest comparables must reflect materially similar credit profile, scale and risk attributes rather than rely on a single unsuitable comparable. Penalty proceedings for under-reporting, misreporting or alleged false entries remain separate from assessment proceedings, making a challenge to their initiation premature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 10:15:19 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 10:15:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Transfer-pricing comparability adjustments require quantified evidence, while regulatory borrowing ceilings do not replace arm&#039;s-length benchmarking.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104903</link>
      <description>Rule 10B(3) requires examination of differences that materially affect net profit margins and reasonably accurate comparability adjustments where quantification is possible. Capacity underutilisation and differing customs-duty burdens may distort manufacturing-segment profitability, but claims require complete quantitative and documentary support and fresh functional comparability analysis. Regulatory ceilings for external commercial borrowings do not replace transfer-pricing arm&#039;s-length benchmarking; interest comparables must reflect materially similar credit profile, scale and risk attributes rather than rely on a single unsuitable comparable. Penalty proceedings for under-reporting, misreporting or alleged false entries remain separate from assessment proceedings, making a challenge to their initiation premature.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 10:15:19 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>