Cost-to-cost reimbursement of seconded employees is not service consideration; transfer-pricing markup was deleted and amalgamation amortisation allow...
Crystallisation of liability supports prior-period expense deduction, while functionally distinct divisions require separate transfer-pricing benchmar...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires transaction-specific FAR analysis before benchmarking business-support services provided to associated en...
Advance pricing agreement methodology can guide benchmarking for non-covered years when functions, assets, risks and activities remain materially unch...
Tax-audit exemption for substantially State-funded educational universities prevents audit-failure penalties where income qualifies for statutory exem...
Functional, asset and risk analysis excludes diversified technology companies from captive software development comparables under cost-plus arrangemen...
Mobile-phone electronic evidence failed to establish customs undervaluation, while duty survived on non-authentic origin certificates without importer...
Transfer-pricing comparability under the transactional net margin method requires economically reliable uncontrolled benchmarks under Section 92C and Rule 10B. Turnover is not a standalone statutory bar, but material scale differences may justify excluding enterprises where brand value, intangibles, bargaining power, assets, risks or market conditions could affect margins. A turnover threshold must therefore be supported by transaction-specific comparability analysis rather than applied as a universal rule. Related-party transaction filters seek to reduce the influence of controlled dealings on comparable profitability. A 15% threshold is ordinarily appropriate where sufficient reliable comparables exist; a higher threshold requires a recorded finding that lower-RPT comparables are unavailable. Functional, asset and risk analysis remains essential, and appellate review may address disregard of statutory criteria or perverse findings.
Transfer-pricing comparability under the transactional net margin method requires economically reliable uncontrolled benchmarks under Section 92C and Rule 10B. Turnover is not a standalone statutory bar, but material scale differences may justify excluding enterprises where brand value, intangibles, bargaining power, assets, risks or market conditions could affect margins. A turnover threshold must therefore be supported by transaction-specific comparability analysis rather than applied as a universal rule. Related-party transaction filters seek to reduce the influence of controlled dealings on comparable profitability. A 15% threshold is ordinarily appropriate where sufficient reliable comparables exist; a higher threshold requires a recorded finding that lower-RPT comparables are unavailable. Functional, asset and risk analysis remains essential, and appellate review may address disregard of statutory criteria or perverse findings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4902 
