Constitutional personal-liberty safeguards limit PMLA twin bail conditions where completed investigations lead to prolonged incarceration before trial...
Automated airline software subscriptions without human intervention fail technical-services characterisation and do not make available underlying tech...
Business support recruitment and training receipts qualify for presumptive business taxation, not professional taxation under technical consultancy ru...
Treaty exemption for foreign permanent-establishment management fees prevailed, while dividend expense disallowance remained limited to an accepted al...
Centralised assessment transfers: participation after requesting centralisation can bar technical jurisdictional challenges, while assessment disputes...
Binding precedent remains operative despite pending challenge, supporting deletion of interest disallowance when debt is converted into preference sha...
Page of 4912
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
121 to 140 of 98239 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of a concluded scrutiny assessment beyond four years requires recorded reasons that independently demonstrate tangible material, a rational link to income escaping assessment, and the taxpayer's failure to make a full and true disclosure of primary facts. Recorded reasons containing factual errors and no connection between an alleged entry operator and the shareholder do not establish due application of mind or a valid reason to believe. Disclosure of shareholder details, banking particulars and confirmations satisfies the taxpayer's obligation; the taxpayer need not draw further factual or legal inferences for the Assessing Officer. The reopening and consequential reassessment were void ab initio and quashed.
Reopening of a concluded scrutiny assessment beyond four years requires recorded reasons that independently demonstrate tangible material, a rational link to income escaping assessment, and the taxpayer's failure to make a full and true disclosure of primary facts. Recorded reasons containing factual errors and no connection between an alleged entry operator and the shareholder do not establish due application of mind or a valid reason to believe. Disclosure of shareholder details, banking particulars and confirmations satisfies the taxpayer's obligation; the taxpayer need not draw further factual or legal inferences for the Assessing Officer. The reopening and consequential reassessment were void ab initio and quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.