Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Reopening beyond the statutory time limit fails when recorded reasons lack tangible material and disclosures were complete.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Reopening of a concluded scrutiny assessment beyond four years requires recorded reasons that independently demonstrate tangible material, a rational link to income escaping assessment, and the taxpayer's failure to make a full and true disclosure of primary facts. Recorded reasons containing factual errors and no connection between an alleged entry operator and the shareholder do not establish due application of mind or a valid reason to believe. Disclosure of shareholder details, banking particulars and confirmations satisfies the taxpayer's obligation; the taxpayer need not draw further factual or legal inferences for the Assessing Officer. The reopening and consequential reassessment were void ab initio and quashed.....