COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Concurrent factual findings on cash credits recorded in an impounded diary did not give rise to a substantial question of law in the income-tax appeals. The credits recorded in a partner's name were treated as unaccounted funds introduced by the partner into the partnership firm after considering the stated unaccounted sources. A plea to assess the entire diary amount in the partner's hands required reconsideration of those factual findings rather than resolution of a legal issue. The challenges therefore failed for want of a substantial question of law.
Concurrent factual findings on cash credits recorded in an impounded diary did not give rise to a substantial question of law in the income-tax appeals. The credits recorded in a partner's name were treated as unaccounted funds introduced by the partner into the partnership firm after considering the stated unaccounted sources. A plea to assess the entire diary amount in the partner's hands required reconsideration of those factual findings rather than resolution of a legal issue. The challenges therefore failed for want of a substantial question of law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
