https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104072 Concurrent factual findings on cash credits recorded in an impounded diary did not give rise to a substantial question of law in the income-tax appeals. The credits recorded in a partner's name were treated as unaccounted funds introduced by the partner into the partnership firm after considering the stated unaccounted sources. A plea to assess the entire diary amount in the partner's hands required reconsideration of those factual findings rather than resolution of a legal issue. The challenges therefore failed for want of a substantial question of law. en-us Wed, 23 Sep 2026 08:48:39 +0530 Wed, 23 Sep 2026 08:48:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104072 Concurrent factual findings on cash credits recorded in an impounded diary did not give rise to a substantial question of law in the income-tax appeals. The credits recorded in a partner's name were treated as unaccounted funds introduced by the partner into the partnership firm after considering the stated unaccounted sources. A plea to assess the entire diary amount in the partner's hands required reconsideration of those factual findings rather than resolution of a legal issue. The challenges therefore failed for want of a substantial question of law. Highlights Income Tax Wed, 23 Sep 2026 08:48:39 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104072