Head Office cost allocation requires prescribed transfer-pricing methods; treaty ceilings bar surcharge and cess, while duplicate taxation is excluded...
Cost-to-cost reimbursement of seconded employees is not service consideration; transfer-pricing markup was deleted and amalgamation amortisation allow...
Crystallisation of liability supports prior-period expense deduction, while functionally distinct divisions require separate transfer-pricing benchmar...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires transaction-specific FAR analysis before benchmarking business-support services provided to associated en...
Advance pricing agreement methodology can guide benchmarking for non-covered years when functions, assets, risks and activities remain materially unch...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Concurrent factual findings on cash credits recorded in an impounded diary did not give rise to a substantial question of law in the income-tax appeals. The credits recorded in a partner's name were treated as unaccounted funds introduced by the partner into the partnership firm after considering the stated unaccounted sources. A plea to assess the entire diary amount in the partner's hands required reconsideration of those factual findings rather than resolution of a legal issue. The challenges therefore failed for want of a substantial question of law.
Concurrent factual findings on cash credits recorded in an impounded diary did not give rise to a substantial question of law in the income-tax appeals. The credits recorded in a partner's name were treated as unaccounted funds introduced by the partner into the partnership firm after considering the stated unaccounted sources. A plea to assess the entire diary amount in the partner's hands required reconsideration of those factual findings rather than resolution of a legal issue. The challenges therefore failed for want of a substantial question of law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
