Head Office cost allocation requires prescribed transfer-pricing methods; treaty ceilings bar surcharge and cess, while duplicate taxation is excluded...
Cost-to-cost reimbursement of seconded employees is not service consideration; transfer-pricing markup was deleted and amalgamation amortisation allow...
Crystallisation of liability supports prior-period expense deduction, while functionally distinct divisions require separate transfer-pricing benchmar...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires transaction-specific FAR analysis before benchmarking business-support services provided to associated en...
Advance pricing agreement methodology can guide benchmarking for non-covered years when functions, assets, risks and activities remain materially unch...
Tax-audit exemption for substantially State-funded educational universities prevents audit-failure penalties where income qualifies for statutory exem...
Functional, asset and risk analysis excludes diversified technology companies from captive software development comparables under cost-plus arrangemen...
Page of 4920
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 98394 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Undisclosed-income additions for penny-stock transactions cannot rest solely on Investigation Wing information where recorded share purchases and sales show a loss and no substantive or corroborative evidence establishes unaccounted income. The ITAT therefore deleted that addition. It also deleted an estimated-profit addition for alleged share dealings: the taxpayer denied the transactions, and estimating profit from alleged turnover without substantive supporting material amounted to assumption, presumption and speculation. Both additions failed for lack of substantive and corroborative evidence.
Undisclosed-income additions for penny-stock transactions cannot rest solely on Investigation Wing information where recorded share purchases and sales show a loss and no substantive or corroborative evidence establishes unaccounted income. The ITAT therefore deleted that addition. It also deleted an estimated-profit addition for alleged share dealings: the taxpayer denied the transactions, and estimating profit from alleged turnover without substantive supporting material amounted to assumption, presumption and speculation. Both additions failed for lack of substantive and corroborative evidence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4920 
