Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Retrospective cancellation of GST registration must be supported by specific contingencies, and both the show cause notice and the cancellation order must disclose the factual basis and reasons. Where the notice is silent on the grounds for retrospective action and the cancellation order is equally unreasoned, the proceedings are unsustainable for breach of the requirement of reasoned quasi-judicial action and fair hearing. Applying that principle, the High Court set aside the show cause notice, the order cancelling registration retrospectively, and the order rejecting revocation, while granting the authorities liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law.
Retrospective cancellation of GST registration must be supported by specific contingencies, and both the show cause notice and the cancellation order must disclose the factual basis and reasons. Where the notice is silent on the grounds for retrospective action and the cancellation order is equally unreasoned, the proceedings are unsustainable for breach of the requirement of reasoned quasi-judicial action and fair hearing. Applying that principle, the High Court set aside the show cause notice, the order cancelling registration retrospectively, and the order rejecting revocation, while granting the authorities liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.