Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Each capital gains transaction was treated as a separate source of income, so section 90(2) allowed the assessee to apply the India-Singapore DTAA to one transaction and the Act to another where more beneficial. The Tribunal rejected compulsory aggregation of all capital gains and losses under the head of capital gains, holding that source-wise treaty choice cannot be overridden by a uniform application of the Act. Gains from shares acquired before 01.04.2017 and covered by Article 13(4A) of the treaty were outside taxable income in India and could not be brought into the Act's computation for set-off purposes. The addition was deleted.
Each capital gains transaction was treated as a separate source of income, so section 90(2) allowed the assessee to apply the India-Singapore DTAA to one transaction and the Act to another where more beneficial. The Tribunal rejected compulsory aggregation of all capital gains and losses under the head of capital gains, holding that source-wise treaty choice cannot be overridden by a uniform application of the Act. Gains from shares acquired before 01.04.2017 and covered by Article 13(4A) of the treaty were outside taxable income in India and could not be brought into the Act's computation for set-off purposes. The addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
