Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The Tribunal held that sales to the assessee's partnership firm were genuine because the alleged bogus-sales finding rested only on third-party statements, while GST returns, Form 26AS, ledger accounts and bank evidence consistently supported the transactions. It noted that corresponding purchases were accepted, stock reduced on sale, and no defect was found in the documentary records or any incriminating material in search. In the absence of material showing the transactions were sham, the Revenue could not estimate commission or profit at 8% on assumptions and conjecture. The addition based on alleged bogus sales was deleted and the appeal was partly allowed.
The Tribunal held that sales to the assessee's partnership firm were genuine because the alleged bogus-sales finding rested only on third-party statements, while GST returns, Form 26AS, ledger accounts and bank evidence consistently supported the transactions. It noted that corresponding purchases were accepted, stock reduced on sale, and no defect was found in the documentary records or any incriminating material in search. In the absence of material showing the transactions were sham, the Revenue could not estimate commission or profit at 8% on assumptions and conjecture. The addition based on alleged bogus sales was deleted and the appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
