Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Contractual supply of food to corporate clients was held to be a supply of service, not restaurant service, because the provider was engaged in menu finalisation, hygiene and quality oversight, delivery coordination, and personnel deployment under service agreements. The activity did not involve its own restaurant, eating joint, mess or canteen premises, and did not fall within outdoor catering or hotel accommodation. It was classified under SAC 996337 as a residual food and beverage service, outside entries 7(i) to 7(v) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), and therefore taxable under entry 7(vi) at 18% GST. The advance ruling was affirmed.
Contractual supply of food to corporate clients was held to be a supply of service, not restaurant service, because the provider was engaged in menu finalisation, hygiene and quality oversight, delivery coordination, and personnel deployment under service agreements. The activity did not involve its own restaurant, eating joint, mess or canteen premises, and did not fall within outdoor catering or hotel accommodation. It was classified under SAC 996337 as a residual food and beverage service, outside entries 7(i) to 7(v) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), and therefore taxable under entry 7(vi) at 18% GST. The advance ruling was affirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
