Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The ITAT held that an alleged unexplained investment in shares must be assessed in the correct year of taxability. On the basis of the contract-cum-bill, the broker's ledger and IDS disclosure material, it found that the shares were purchased on 02.07.2010, so the investment fell in AY 2011-12 and not AY 2012-13. The addition made in AY 2012-13 was therefore deleted and the appellate order set aside. The Tribunal left it open to the Assessing Officer to examine the source of the investment in the year of purchase in accordance with law.
The ITAT held that an alleged unexplained investment in shares must be assessed in the correct year of taxability. On the basis of the contract-cum-bill, the broker's ledger and IDS disclosure material, it found that the shares were purchased on 02.07.2010, so the investment fell in AY 2011-12 and not AY 2012-13. The addition made in AY 2012-13 was therefore deleted and the appellate order set aside. The Tribunal left it open to the Assessing Officer to examine the source of the investment in the year of purchase in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
