PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Faceless assessment requires a mandatory show cause notice under...
Faceless assessment notice must cover specific prejudicial variations; unexplained final additions without notice breach section 144B and natural justice.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Faceless assessment requires a mandatory show cause notice under section 144B(1)(xii) specifying each variation prejudicial to the assessee. Where the notice proposed only an ad hoc income estimate at 8% of turnover, but the final assessment instead made separate additions for unsecured loans and disallowances of interest and other expenses, the statutory notice requirement was not satisfied. Those final variations were not covered by the notice, so the assessment proceeded in breach of section 144B(1)(xii) and natural justice. The Tribunal sustained deletion of the additions and disallowances and dismissed the Revenue's challenge.
Faceless assessment requires a mandatory show cause notice under section 144B(1)(xii) specifying each variation prejudicial to the assessee. Where the notice proposed only an ad hoc income estimate at 8% of turnover, but the final assessment instead made separate additions for unsecured loans and disallowances of interest and other expenses, the statutory notice requirement was not satisfied. Those final variations were not covered by the notice, so the assessment proceeded in breach of section 144B(1)(xii) and natural justice. The Tribunal sustained deletion of the additions and disallowances and dismissed the Revenue's challenge.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.