Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC held that a registered co-operative credit society providing...
Co-operative credit society deduction on bank deposit interest upheld where funds were business funds and income remained attributable to member credit activities.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
HC held that a registered co-operative credit society providing credit facilities to its members was entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) on interest earned from bank deposits, because the deposited funds were its own business funds and the interest retained the character of business income attributable to that activity. The Court followed earlier Division Bench rulings and distinguished the Supreme Court decision in Citizens Co-operative Society Limited, noting that case involved dealings with non-members and a finance business where mutuality was absent; the contrary orders were set aside and the matter was remitted for reconsideration accordingly.
HC held that a registered co-operative credit society providing credit facilities to its members was entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) on interest earned from bank deposits, because the deposited funds were its own business funds and the interest retained the character of business income attributable to that activity. The Court followed earlier Division Bench rulings and distinguished the Supreme Court decision in Citizens Co-operative Society Limited, noting that case involved dealings with non-members and a finance business where mutuality was absent; the contrary orders were set aside and the matter was remitted for reconsideration accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.