Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Cancellation of GST registration for non-filing of returns may be dropped where the registered person furnishes all pending returns and pays the tax dues, interest and late fee, as reflected in the proviso to Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules. The text notes that the cancellation power under Section 29(2)(c) extends to non-filing for six continuous months, but serious civil consequences justify permitting restoration on compliance. It also states that expiry of the revocation timeline was not treated as a bar in the circumstances discussed. The petitioner was given two months to approach the authority, which was directed to consider restoration expeditiously in accordance with law.
Cancellation of GST registration for non-filing of returns may be dropped where the registered person furnishes all pending returns and pays the tax dues, interest and late fee, as reflected in the proviso to Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules. The text notes that the cancellation power under Section 29(2)(c) extends to non-filing for six continuous months, but serious civil consequences justify permitting restoration on compliance. It also states that expiry of the revocation timeline was not treated as a bar in the circumstances discussed. The petitioner was given two months to approach the authority, which was directed to consider restoration expeditiously in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
