Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cancellation of GST registration under Section 29(2)(c) could be interfered with and the registration restored on the taxpayer furnishing all pending returns and clearing tax dues with interest and late fee under the proviso to Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017.
Analysis: Cancellation of registration for non-filing of returns for a continuous period of six months attracts Section 29(2)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the procedure for cancellation is governed by Rule 22 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. The proviso to Rule 22(4) permits the proper officer to drop the cancellation proceedings and pass the prescribed order where the person, instead of replying to the notice, furnishes all pending returns and makes full payment of tax dues with applicable interest and late fee. Since cancellation of registration entails serious civil consequences, the authority can consider restoration if the statutory requirements are met.
Conclusion: The petitioner was permitted to approach the concerned authority within two months and, upon compliance with the proviso to Rule 22(4), the authority was directed to consider restoration of GST registration in accordance with law.