Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Exemption for an educational institution under section 10(23C)(iiiab) was allowed because the Tribunal found the issue squarely covered by its earlier order in the assessee's own case, which had followed the Rajasthan High Court's view, and there was no change in facts for the years under consideration. On that basis, the Tribunal declined to depart from the earlier reasoning and sustained the assessee's claim to exemption as a wholly or substantially Government-financed educational institution. As a result, the additions linked to the assessment no longer survived and the revenue's appeals were dismissed.
Exemption for an educational institution under section 10(23C)(iiiab) was allowed because the Tribunal found the issue squarely covered by its earlier order in the assessee's own case, which had followed the Rajasthan High Court's view, and there was no change in facts for the years under consideration. On that basis, the Tribunal declined to depart from the earlier reasoning and sustained the assessee's claim to exemption as a wholly or substantially Government-financed educational institution. As a result, the additions linked to the assessment no longer survived and the revenue's appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.