Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Article 24(4) (non-discrimination) of the India-Denmark DTAA precludes a domestic thin-capitalisation measure that differentiates deductibility of interest based on creditor residence; applying treaty supremacy via section 90(2) the Tribunal concluded the section 94B disallowance could not be sustained where the debt and interest were accepted as arm's-length. The note further records computational principles: EBITDA must reflect gross (actual) depreciation, not netting by subvention; only interest actually deductible may be counted for the statutory limit; notional Ind AS accretion and interest already disallowed as capital must be excluded from the section 94B computation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.