Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Whether rights under a buyer/allotment agreement constitute a transfer taxable as capital gains was decided by applying the statutory definitions of capital asset and transfer, with emphasis on clauses covering part performance and transactions enabling enjoyment of immovable property. The Tribunal found the assessee held enforceable rights from allotment and that the executed agreement to sell effected a transfer within the statutory definition; consequently the receipts were assessable under capital gains. The assessee's claimed indexed cost exceeded consideration, producing an allowable long-term capital loss, and the appeal was allowed on that basis.
Whether rights under a buyer/allotment agreement constitute a transfer taxable as capital gains was decided by applying the statutory definitions of capital asset and transfer, with emphasis on clauses covering part performance and transactions enabling enjoyment of immovable property. The Tribunal found the assessee held enforceable rights from allotment and that the executed agreement to sell effected a transfer within the statutory definition; consequently the receipts were assessable under capital gains. The assessee's claimed indexed cost exceeded consideration, producing an allowable long-term capital loss, and the appeal was allowed on that basis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.