Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The tribunal affirmed that cash deposits in the assessee's proprietorship bank accounts during the demonetisation period were treated as unexplained income where the assessee failed to respond to statutory notices or furnish any explanation or documents; on the basis of bank data the deposits were attributed to the assessee and taxed accordingly. Separately, the claimed current-year loss set off was disallowed because the assessee did not produce supporting details before the tax authorities or on appeal, leaving the claim unsubstantiated. All grounds of appeal were dismissed for lack of material and failure to furnish explanations or appear.
The tribunal affirmed that cash deposits in the assessee's proprietorship bank accounts during the demonetisation period were treated as unexplained income where the assessee failed to respond to statutory notices or furnish any explanation or documents; on the basis of bank data the deposits were attributed to the assessee and taxed accordingly. Separately, the claimed current-year loss set off was disallowed because the assessee did not produce supporting details before the tax authorities or on appeal, leaving the claim unsubstantiated. All grounds of appeal were dismissed for lack of material and failure to furnish explanations or appear.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.