Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The tribunal affirmed that cash deposits in the assessee's proprietorship bank accounts during the demonetisation period were treated as unexplained income where the assessee failed to respond to statutory notices or furnish any explanation or documents; on the basis of bank data the deposits were attributed to the assessee and taxed accordingly. Separately, the claimed current-year loss set off was disallowed because the assessee did not produce supporting details before the tax authorities or on appeal, leaving the claim unsubstantiated. All grounds of appeal were dismissed for lack of material and failure to furnish explanations or appear.
The tribunal affirmed that cash deposits in the assessee's proprietorship bank accounts during the demonetisation period were treated as unexplained income where the assessee failed to respond to statutory notices or furnish any explanation or documents; on the basis of bank data the deposits were attributed to the assessee and taxed accordingly. Separately, the claimed current-year loss set off was disallowed because the assessee did not produce supporting details before the tax authorities or on appeal, leaving the claim unsubstantiated. All grounds of appeal were dismissed for lack of material and failure to furnish explanations or appear.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.